right on with the menu driven on the early 1900's ... they are goofy.
jason -----Original Message----- From: Daniel Cotts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 02:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391] Cisco has had two releases of the "2900XL" series. The early ones were deeper and (I believe) used a 9 pin console cable. I seem to remember that they did not have the XL logo. Confirmation/denial requested from the list. For set based command switches then best to be specific: 2901, 2926. BTW 4000s are set based. 3500XL are IOS based. > -----Original Message----- > From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, December 17, 2001 1:14 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Switch types for BCMSN [7:29391] > > > The 1900 series is also menu-driven. To make things more confusing, > their IOS-type command set is different than the IOS-like commands on > the 2900XL series. > > John > > >>> "Dennis Laganiere" 12/17/01 11:45:33 > AM >>> > I'm trying to sort out once-and-for-all where the demarcation line is > between families of switches. Here's what I've got so far: > > IOS-Based > Cat 1900 series > Cat 2820 series > Cat 2900XL series > > Set-based > Cat5000 series > Cat 6000 series > Cat 6500 series > Cat 2900 > > However, the 2900XL uses different commands for trunking, portfast and > uplinkfast then the other IOS based switches. > > Does that sound right? > > --- Dennis Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29402&t=29391 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
