I believe you are correct that the earlier 2900XL switches were (much) deeper and required a DB9 console connector. All of the 2900s I've ever used were IOS based, not set based. However, I can't say I've used all of the different models 2900 out there =)
Mike Daniel Cotts wrote: > > Cisco has had two releases of the "2900XL" series. The early > ones were > deeper and (I believe) used a 9 pin console cable. I seem to > remember that > they did not have the XL logo. Confirmation/denial requested > from the list. > > For set based command switches then best to be specific: 2901, > 2926. > > BTW 4000s are set based. 3500XL are IOS based. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29406&t=29391 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
