in its most simple form, without a routing protocol, you could at each site go;
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 internet connected interface ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 enterprise connected interface 200 Then of course with internet traffic cruising your normally private network, some security auditing may be in order, depending on your setup. Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Mon, 17 Dec 2001, Patrick Ramsey wrote: > yeah I think that was the consensous. : ) I'm going to do some more reading > and research this a bit more. From what I can tell I think the simplest > will be the floating static default route. > > thanks! (and to everyone else!) > > -Patrick > > >>> "Priscilla Oppenheimer" 12/17/01 07:11PM >>> > This isn't a job for HSRP. HSRP provides redundancy from end-station > clients to their default gateway. The clients' default gateway(s) must be > in the same subnet as the clients. It doesn't sound like that would be the > case for any of the non-local routers. > > It sounds like a job for a routing protocol. IGRP claims to figure out a > candidate default route. Would it dynamically select a new route when the > Internet interface went down? Or how about using OSPF and its ability to > interject Type 4 routes to Autonomous System Boundary Routers? > > You could probably do this without a routing protocol too with a backup > command of some sort of a floating static (default) route. OK, so I'm > waving my hands here. ;-) But I can say for sure that you're barking up the > wrong tree with HSRP. > > Priscilla > > At 05:51 PM 12/17/01, Patrick Ramsey wrote: > >Ok guys/gals, > > > >I have a scenario here that I am trying to implement and before I start > >working on it, I would like some personal opinions/expereinces from anyone > >that cares to respond. > > > >we have 6 major facilities all connected via various speed wan links. Each > >facillity has it's own connection to the internet with default routes set > >accordingly. Each facillity then has statics back to each of the other > >facillites. > > > >Currently their is no redundancy in the internet connectivity. If one site > >loses it's internet T, then it's down until that T comes back. Nobody has > >ever complained about this being an issue, but it just seems a bit silly to > >pay for 6 T's and not get full use of them. > > > >I have never setup hsrp before and am reading about it right now. But is > >hsrp all that I need to accomplish this task? > > > >each facillity has mulitple networks seperated by it's core layer3 switch, > >then the wan links are either 2600's or 3600's > > > >thanks! > > > >-Patrick > ________________________ > > Priscilla Oppenheimer > http://www.priscilla.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=29441&t=29417 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
