That may be true   but I'd also be interested in a more accurate
survey.  The problem with these surveys is that they don't take enough
variables into account.  A certification alone is not enough to make a
judgement.  We should take into account education, years in the field,
etc.

For example, there are probably CCNAs making double what I'm making
because they've got over twice the time in the field, one or more
degrees, etc.  There are also probably a few CCIEs making less than I,
but I'm not so sure about that.  ;-)  They'd have to be unemployed
entirely and that doesn't count!  heh heh....

So, I think a good survey would ask you which certs you have, how long
you've been in the field, your educational background, and then your
salary.  I think the end result would produce data that would be far
more useful for comparison.

John

>>> "Gaz"  12/28/01 2:15:33 PM >>>
To be honest, if I were to take part in the survey, I would inflate
the
salary and expect most others to do the same.
This wouldn't be done out of pride or to impress, but what are you
going to
get out of giving your real salary out.
May as well try to push the going rate up, I would have thought.
Otherwise, knowing my employer, he'll try and pay well below the
average
anyway, pay will spiral downwards and before long, you'd be better off
working in the cafe next door.


Gaz


""Paul Jin""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I think it is part B.S. and part people that were lucky that
> are making the avg or above avg.
>
> For many of the people making more then the average, I believe it
was
> a combination of
> 1 - salesmanship
> 2 - outright LIE
> 3 - interviewer not making sure they can do what they say
> they can.
> I said many not all.. some trully deserve it and more...




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30390&t=30237
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to