looking at r2, it appears that connected routes for the 172.16.1.0 network are showing up on both serial0 and serial1. Using 2 sets of ips out of the same class c and assigning both pairs a /24 netmask?
Brian "Sonic" Whalen Success = Preparation + Opportunity On Sun, 30 Dec 2001, McHugh Randy wrote: > Here is the routing table on R2 and R4. I have a hub and spoke config with > frame relay between R1 - R2,R3, and the frame connection between R1 and R4 > is not coming up so hence the need for a direct serial back to back from R2 > to R4. > R2#sh ip route > Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP > D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area > N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 > E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP > i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter > area > * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR > P - periodic downloaded static route > > Gateway of last resort is not set > > C 223.2.2.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0 > 172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 3 subnets > O IA 172.16.5.0 [110/128] via 172.16.1.3, 16:37:46, Serial0 > O 172.16.6.0 [110/74] via 172.16.1.1, 18:17:57, Serial0 > C 172.16.1.0 is directly connected, Serial0 > is directly connected, Serial1 > 10.0.0.0/8 is variably subnetted, 6 subnets, 2 masks > O IA 10.1.11.1/32 [110/65] via 172.16.1.1, 18:17:57, Serial0 > O IA 10.1.12.1/32 [110/65] via 172.16.1.1, 18:17:57, Serial0 > O IA 10.1.31.1/32 [110/65] via 172.16.1.3, 18:17:58, Serial0 > C 10.1.22.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback2 > C 10.1.21.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback1 > O IA 10.1.32.1/32 [110/65] via 172.16.1.3, 18:17:58, Serial0 > > R4#sh ip route > Codes: C - connected, S - static, I - IGRP, R - RIP, M - mobile, B - BGP > D - EIGRP, EX - EIGRP external, O - OSPF, IA - OSPF inter area > N1 - OSPF NSSA external type 1, N2 - OSPF NSSA external type 2 > E1 - OSPF external type 1, E2 - OSPF external type 2, E - EGP > i - IS-IS, L1 - IS-IS level-1, L2 - IS-IS level-2, ia - IS-IS inter > area > * - candidate default, U - per-user static route, o - ODR > P - periodic downloaded static route > > Gateway of last resort is not set > > C 223.4.4.0/24 is directly connected, Loopback0 > 172.16.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets > C 172.16.6.0 is directly connected, Ethernet0 > C 172.16.1.0 is directly connected, Serial1 > 10.0.0.0/24 is subnetted, 2 subnets > C 10.1.42.0 is directly connected, Loopback2 > C 10.1.41.0 is directly connected, Loopback1 > As you can see there is no direct connection shown between serial 1 on R4 > which is 172.16.1.4 which is directly connected to serial 1 on R2 172.16.1.5 > . It may have something to do with the load balance or another path to the > same source. Any suggestions welcome and appreciated. > Thank you, > Randy Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30512&t=30449 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
