-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

We have used the Big IP load balancers from F5....we looked at alteon
and radware...these things blew them away.  Highly recommended and
the support is second to none.

- -----Original Message-----
From: matt shiite [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 02, 2002 4:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: SSL Accelerators [7:30724]


Personnally I have used the Alteon series
loadbalancers with their ISD ssl accelerator.  I can't
complain...they have worked like a champ. Just another
option for ya  :)


ms
- --- Gaz  wrote:
> Not providing many/any answers here I'm afraid -
> just asking more questions.
> Is SSL that suitable for caching? I would have
> thought that most SSL traffic
> would be unique (Session ID's/transaction info etc).
> That's not a cocky question, I really don't know. I
> suppose there will be
> static content within the SSL pages.
> 
> I've used Intel SSL accelerators which seem to
> perform pretty well. We also
> do a fair bit of load balancing with Foundry
> Networks kit (Server Irons/Big
> Irons) and they're pretty nippy and pretty cheap
> compared to Cisco, and have
> the advantage that their CLI is very close to Cisco.
> I suppose it depends what scale you're doing it on.
> 
> From what I've seen of the Cisco CSS (Arrowpoint
> kit) they seem to offer
> greater functionality/flexibility than Foundry, but
> not seen much of them
> working in anger yet.
> 
> Be interesting to hear what Stratacache really mean
> by caching content in
> SSL-ready format.
> 
> 
> Gaz
> 
> ""John Neiberger""  wrote in message
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > We are looking at buying some new load balancing
> switches and new cache
> > engines and somewhere in that mix we want to add
> SSL acceleration.  One
> > vendor that we're looking at sells load balancing
> switches with SSL
> > acceleration built-in.  Of course, they really
> like their way of doing
> > this.  The other vendor has a cache engine with
> SSL acceleration and
> > they say there is a significant performance
> increase by caching content
> > in SSL-ready format.
> >
> > Do any of you have any thoughts here?  The first
> vendor is F5 and I
> > really like the looks of their Big IP series.  The
> second vendor is
> > Stratacache and I really don't know much about
> them despite having
> > talked to them about this.  :-)
> >
> > Any tips?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > John
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Send your FREE holiday greetings online!
http://greetings.yahoo.com
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPfreeware 6.5.8 for non-commercial use 

iQA/AwUBPDSNepjWtn+JGXXMEQLZKQCg+3TOggr5jPHDkiiIUNA432QyXuEAn0q+
3h+AjGl07oBaBEd50z9qYxqR
=Go/H
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=30797&t=30724
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to