1. Thanks for the GRE tunnel with keys suggestion, but can you configure this without specifying the remote endpoint?
Any idea where I could find this on CCO ... the logical interface configuration guide seems to say that the endpoints _must_ be specified and that keys just provide weak protection against misconfiguration .... But, if you can avoid configuring the endpoint, this would fit the bill perfectly .... :-) 2. Has anyone ever fooled with "asynchronous host mobility?" This demands some lab time .... http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios122/122sup/122csum/csum2/122csdia/dsfshsev.htm#xtocid630954 and http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios120/12cgcr/inter_c/iclogint.htm#xtocid564814 3. Several folks have written asking if IPSec wouldn't choke a 2500 .... to which the answer is, but the traffic would be so light, just a 3des tunnel usually carrying a single active telnet session (to provide remote troubleshooting access). Does the group think this is an unwise load for a 2500? Jason Robert Oppenheimer wrote: > If by dynamic, you mean GRE multipoint tunneling (with keys) You got it!! Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32147&t=32057 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
