I understand and appreciate your concern but in the hundreds of frame
connections I have done I have never seen LMI negociation fail becuse it
was auto on the switches.

  Dave

Ole Drews Jensen wrote:
> 
> Remembering my day in hell when I had a 10/100 auto sense problem where the
> STP blocked a LAN interface on my router, I was wondering how well the AUTO
> LMI setting works. Is it reliable and recommendable?
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Ole
> 
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  Ole Drews Jensen
>  Systems Network Manager
>  CCNP, MCSE, MCP+I
>  RWR Enterprises, Inc.
>  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  http://www.RouterChief.com
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>  NEED A JOB ???
>  http://www.oledrews.com/job
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: MADMAN [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 22, 2002 9:22 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: CIR [7:32747]
> 
> You would be correct.  We configure our switches to auto so the
> customer can choose their favorite LMI.  Some providers force you to use
> ANSI which wil not provide CIR, hmm I wonder why they would do that...
> 
>   Dave
> 
> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" wrote:
> >
> > I would have thought that this would only work if your provider also used
> > Cisco LMI type??
> >
> > Apart from the other suggestions, you could always ask your provider. 
Try
> > asking whoever you deal with for support, rather than whoever you deal
> > with for ordering - the support mob will hopefully check what is
> > provisioned, while the ordering mob may just check what you ordered.
> > Your provider may have some reporting system in place for customers that
> > you can use to check - you may be able to get other reports as well.
Maybe
> > not, but it doesn't hurt to ask.
> >
> > JMcL
> > ----- Forwarded by Jenny Mcleod/NSO/CSDA on 22/01/2002 11:47 am -----
> >
> > "MADMAN"
> > Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 22/01/2002 10:13 am
> > Please respond to "MADMAN"
> >
> >
> >         To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >         cc:
> >         Subject:        Re: CIR [7:32747]
> >
> > leave the default Cisco lmi type and it's provided by via LMI full
> > status update:
> >
> > C7206#sh frame-relay map
> > Serial5/0.18 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 18(0x12,0x420), broadcast,
> > BW = 102
> > 4000
> >           status defined, active
> > Serial5/0.19 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 19(0x13,0x430), broadcast,
> > BW = 768
> > 000
> >           status defined, active
> > Serial5/0.16 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 16(0x10,0x400), broadcast,
> > BW = 102
> > 4000
> >           status defined, active
> > Serial5/0.17 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 17(0x11,0x410), broadcast,
> > BW = 102
> > 4000
> >           status defined, active
> > Serial5/1.24 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 24(0x18,0x480), broadcast,
> > BW = 768
> > 000
> >           status defined, active
> > Serial5/1.29 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 29(0x1D,0x4D0), broadcast,
> > BW = 102
> > 4000
> >           status defined, active
> > Serial5/1.21 (up): point-to-point dlci, dlci 21(0x15,0x450), broadcast,
> > BW = 768
> > 000
> >           status defined, active
> >
> > Joaquim Lopes wrote:
> > >
> > > How can i check if the cir that i'm paying is what my provider its
> > > delivering?
> > > thanks
> > --
> > David Madland
> > Sr. Network Engineer
> > CCIE# 2016
> > Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 612-664-3367
> >
> > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
> --
> David Madland
> Sr. Network Engineer
> CCIE# 2016
> Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 612-664-3367
> 
> "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
-- 
David Madland
Sr. Network Engineer
CCIE# 2016
Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
612-664-3367

"Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=32825&t=32747
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to