You explanation makes sense. I posted the solution to the frame-relay fragmentation, tried it and it works now. Check earlier archives.
""John Neiberger"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The large fragmentation size is used when you want to turn on the > Dual-FIFO queue but not actually fragment any packets. You need the > Dual-FIFO queue for prioritization at this level to work correctly. > However, I've had nothing but problems with FRF so I turned it off, > sacrificing the dual queue. > > John > > >>> "Steven A. Ridder" 1/23/02 1:38:18 PM > >>> > It seems way off. You don't frag a packet above the MTU. As for the > subnet > mask as an IP, I can't imagine the router taking it. Why can't he put > the > real IP in there? It's been a while since I've seen a customer do > FRF.11 C, > though. I'd do his config right and also add the map classes to both > routers. Furthermore, unless he has about 60 or so calls going across, > I'd > reduce the reserved BW from 720K to a more reasonable number. > > > ""Erich Kuehn"" wrote in message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I have a customer that we provide frame-relay service to. He is > trying to > do > > VoIP over Frame-Relay, while I have quite a bit of experience with IP > and > > Frame-Relay, once you put voice into it I get lost. > > > > His problem is that if his circuit goes down at location A, Once Loc > B > comes > > back up (to my frame-relay switch) Loc A will not come back up. The > only > way > > to force Loc A back up is to shut the interface on the frame-switch > to > which > > Loc A connect and then open it back up. Strange I know. He is > running > > similar routers at both locations (3660's on 12.2xt code) and the > config > are > > nearly identical. With exception > > > > At Loc B under the serial subinterface he has > > > > frame-relay inte.5 255.255.255.252 > > > > Never seen this can anyone explain??? > > > > He also has this in his config at both Loc A and B > > > > Map-class Frame-relay VoIP_FR > > frame-relay fragment 1600 > > frame-relay ip rtp priotity 16384 16383 720 > > no frame-relay adaptive-shaping > > frame-relay fair-queue > > > > At Loc A he makes reference to the map-class under the serial subif > at Loc > B > > he does not. > > > > Anyone with some input?? > > > > Thanks > > > > > > Erich Kuehn > > Network Engineer > > Backbone Communications Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33006&t=32968 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
