""Ali, Abbas"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The branch router is 2600 with built in T1 module. My configurtion is: > > routere(config)int s0/0 > service-module T1 timeslots 1-6 speed 64 along with linecode and framing > just to let you know. I did not specifically assign bandwidth parameter at > the interface level. I assumed that that the timeslot configuration should > be able to take care of a Serial link bandwidth which defaults to T1 1.544M > and change it to 384. But looks like the default serial link bandwidth > takes precedence regardless of timeslots configuration unless I manually > specify the bandwidth 384 command on physical serial link itself. Correct > me if I am wrong.
No the bandwidth stays the same, 1554, even of you change timeslots. So you'd have to change it to 384, cause the router only thinks it's 1 t1's hop away at the moment. Do a sh int s0/0 to see the bandwidth command. > > Regards, > > AA > > -----Original Message----- > From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Router is not installing the better route [7:33102] > > > what does the bandwidth on the interface to the FR cloud say it is, T1 > or384? Is the real T1 link to the site even a FS? > > -- > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html > Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33107&t=33102 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]