""Ali, Abbas""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> The branch router is 2600 with built in T1 module.  My configurtion is:
>
> routere(config)int s0/0
> service-module T1 timeslots 1-6 speed 64 along with linecode and framing
> just to let you know.  I did not specifically assign bandwidth parameter
at
> the interface level.  I assumed that that the timeslot configuration
should
> be able to take care of a Serial link bandwidth which defaults to T1
1.544M
> and change it to 384.  But looks like the default serial link bandwidth
> takes precedence regardless of timeslots configuration unless I manually
> specify the bandwidth 384 command on physical serial link itself.  Correct
> me if I am wrong.

No the bandwidth stays the same, 1554, even of you change timeslots.   So
you'd have to change it to 384, cause the router only thinks it's 1 t1's hop
away at the moment.

Do a sh int s0/0 to see the bandwidth command.


>
> Regards,
>
> AA
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Steven A. Ridder [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Thursday, January 24, 2002 11:06 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: Router is not installing the better route [7:33102]
>
>
> what does the bandwidth on the interface to the FR cloud say it is, T1
> or384?  Is the real T1 link to the site even a FS?
>
> --
> RFC 1149 Compliant.
>
>
> FAQ, list archives, and subscription info:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
> Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33107&t=33102
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to