I don't think there is an equivilent IOS command and yes it's an access by default, VLAN 1 of coarse!!
Dave John Neiberger wrote: > > The 2924XL isn't a CatOS switch. Do you know if it has the equivalent > command? I was under the impression that a switchport on a 2924XL was > an access port by default and had to be manually set to be a trunk port > of any sort. > > Is that not correct? I'll need to check into that as well. > > Thanks, > John > > >>> "W. Alan Robertson" 1/25/02 11:35:00 AM > >>> > Actually, > > It's not just spanning-tree that causes it... > > Are you familiar with "set port host?" It's a macro in newer CatOS. > In addition to enabling portfast on a port, it also disables channel > and trunk negotiation, with is enabled by default. On older CatOS > code, you have to perform each of these three steps independantly, but > you can achieve the same results. > > This has always corrected the problem for me... > > HTH, > > Alan > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "John Neiberger" > To: > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 12:17 PM > Subject: RE: 2924XL and Blue Screen of Death: Resolved [7:33203] > > > I don't think the issue is the switch, but the fact that spanning > tree > > is running. I would guess that any feature that causes the network > to > > be unavailable when one of these machines boots up would cause this > > problem. In fact, it happens even if you're not connected to the > > network at all. > > > > The problem appears to be a combination of issues with the NIC and > the > > new Novell Client software. This problem does not occur in the > previous > > software with these same NICs. > > > > John > > > > >>> "Bill Carter" 1/25/02 10:13:01 AM >>> > > I wonder if these cards would have problems with 3Com switches???? > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf > Of > > John Neiberger > > Sent: Friday, January 25, 2002 9:58 AM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: 2924XL and Blue Screen of Death: Resolved [7:33203] > > > > > > Well, sort of resolved. This turned out to be a known issue with > Dell > > machines, specifically machines using a 3COM 3C905C NIC. They > expect > > the network to be available almost immediately upon bootup and can't > > handle the delay caused by spanning tree. In some cases, even > > portfast > > did not reduce the time sufficiently. > > > > So, watch out for those 3COM NICs! > > > > John > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- David Madland Sr. Network Engineer CCIE# 2016 Qwest Communications Int. Inc. [EMAIL PROTECTED] 612-664-3367 "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33243&t=33203 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
