I waited for an expert to answer, but none did. But sometimes seeing that 
I'm intrigued (and/or confused), smokes them out of their holes. ;-)

It doesn't make sense that turning on MD5 authentication with OSPF would 
cause the demand-circuit to stay up. MD5 doesn't send the key over the 
wire. It's configured into each router and used to generate a message 
digest that is appended to packets, but it doesn't cause extra packets.

Also if the routers agree that this is a demand circuit, you shouldn't have 
to filter the Hellos to 224.0.0.5, and doing so shouldn't cause the routers 
to declare each other dead. Something funny is happening there. I do see 
that Doyle and other references say to implement demand circuits only 
within stub, totally stubby, or NSSA areas. You mentioned that you're doing 
it in Area 0. I wonder if that's a problem.

Could you send us your configs? Since it's a lab network, perhaps you could 
let us see the MD5 keys. (That is, don't configure service 
password-encryption. That way we can see the keys in your configs and maybe 
notice any problem with them.) Thanks.

Priscilla

At 12:23 PM 1/31/02, Richard Newman wrote:
>Hi all.
>I was working on a lab with an ISDN link between two of my OSPF routers. The
>link would come up if the Frame cloud went away. Normal stuff link would be
>initiated as usual. However, since area 0 had authentication turned on
>broadcasts from 224.0.0.5 kept the isdn link up all the time. If I filtered
>out the 224.0.0.5 from being interesting the ospf neighbors would get
>terminated at the dead interval. When I turn off authen. from area 0 all
>worked as normal.
>
>Is this a normal occurrance? When area authentication is turned on do the
>key exchanges still happen even over a demand-circuit?
>
>Thanks...
>Richard Newman
________________________

Priscilla Oppenheimer
http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=33987&t=33884
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to