You don't need to point that out to me. I was always well aware that you could do PPPoFR. I just can't figure out too many reasons why you'd really want to.
""MADMAN"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > If you have been smokin crack you could do that: > > http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/wan_ c/wcdfrely.htm#xtocid42 > > I won't get on the CEF soapbox again though;) > > Dave > > nrf wrote: > > > > I think you mean to say multilink FR. Seems to me that it's rather > > difficult to do PPP multilink on FR (unless, I suppose, you're doing > PPPoFR, > > but who the hell does that?) > > > > ""Michael Williams"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Assuming that you have more than one circuit to the same offsite, you > > could > > > use PPP Multilink to "bond" them together into a 512 or 768 connection. > > > > > > Mike W. > -- > David Madland > Sr. Network Engineer > CCIE# 2016 > Qwest Communications Int. Inc. > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > 612-664-3367 > > "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it" Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=35981&t=35854 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
