No, just wishful thinking.

--

RFC 1149 Compliant.


""ko haag""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Any News on when Cisco may fix it?  I was planning on take the CID test on
> Wednesday.
> Is there another test I could take to get the CCDP?
>
> Ko
>
> "Steven A. Ridder" wrote:
>
> > With all these conflicting answers, it just proves my point that the CID
is
> > a crummy, poorly worded test.  Don't give Cisco the $125 until the fix
it!
> >
> > ""Russ Kreigh""  wrote in message
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> > > I think A would be right, because C would not be a "simple" solution,
ex.
> > > they would have to maintain a list of unauthorized sites.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> > > Love Cisco
> > > Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 10:16 PM
> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Subject: Please help me answer this question [7:36295]
> > >
> > >
> > > 1. Which of the following customers can probably meet their security
> > > requirements with a simple firewall system?
> > > A. Company ABC wants to make sure customers can see public marketing
data
> > > but not proprietary sales figures.
> > > B. University ABC want to make sure students can see but not change
their
> > > grades in administrative database.
> > > C. Company XYZ wants to make sure employees do not download software
from
> > > unauthorized site.
> > > D. University XYZ wants to make sure that public central software
> > developed
> > > at the university stops working after a period of time if the user
does
> > not
> > > pay shareware fees.
> > > =============================================
> > > I think C is right. But some people think A.
> > >
> > > What do you think? Why?




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=36341&t=36295
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to