well, to continue to beat this dead horse ( like anyone cares about RIPv2
CIDR anyway )
Gateway of last resort is not set
172.17.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 172.17.1.0 is directly connected, TokenRing0
173.4.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
C 173.4.57.0 is directly connected, Loopback0
161.52.0.0/24 is subnetted, 1 subnets
R 161.52.1.0 [120/1] via 132.31.99.8, 00:00:24, Virtual-Access1
132.31.0.0/16 is variably subnetted, 2 subnets, 2 masks
C 132.31.99.8/32 is directly connected, Virtual-Access1
C 132.31.99.0/24 is directly connected, Virtual-Access1
C 192.168.0.0/24 is directly connected, Serial0
C 192.168.1.0/24 is directly connected, Serial1
C 200.0.0.0/8 is directly connected, Loopback101
R 201.0.0.0/15 [120/5] via 132.31.99.8, 00:00:11, Virtual-Access1
R 96.0.0.0/4 [120/5] via 132.31.99.8, 00:00:00, Virtual-Access1
R 203.0.0.0/8 [120/5] via 132.31.99.8, 00:00:00, Virtual-Access1
R 129.0.0.0/12 [120/5] via 132.31.99.8, 00:00:00, Virtual-Access1
C 181.48.0.0/13 is directly connected, Loopback201
R7#
note all the CIDR routes in the routing table, all learned via RIP.
How?
interface Loopback101
ip address 201.0.0.1 255.254.0.0
!
interface Loopback1001
ip address 203.0.0.1 255.0.0.0
!
interface Loopback1002
ip address 129.1.1.1 255.240.0.0
!
interface Loopback1003
ip address 100.1.1.1 240.0.0.0
!
router rip
version 2
redistribute connected metric 5
network 132.31.0.0
network 161.52.0.0
network 201.0.0.0
no auto-summary
you apparently do have to redistribute the CIDR routes into RIPv2. Silly me.
Why wouldn't that be obvious?
Chuck
""Chuck"" wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> kinda in answer to your private message:
>
>
http://www.cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/software/ios121/121cgcr/ip_c
> /ipcprt2/1cdrip.htm
> watch the wrap
>
> according to this, Cisco's implementation of Ripv2 does indeed support
CIDR
>
> On the other hand, getting this to work appears to be problematic. A check
> of Doyle shows no CIDR example for Ripv2 A look though Large Scale IP
> Network Solutions yields this interesting sentence: "RIPV2 is able to
> support classless interdomain routes. It can propagate a classless route
> through redistribution"
>
> I can't get a damn CIDR route to show up in the RIPv2 table no matter how
> many hokey pokies I do.
>
> At this point I'm going to assume you have tried RipV2 and have had the
same
> frustration I just had - seeing no CIDR routes. This calls for a bit more
> research.
>
> Chuck
>
>
> ""Chuck"" wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> > I think you're trying to outsmart yourself. Can't be done!!! ;->
> >
> > I showed you in my private reply the result of the EIGRP test I set up.
> The
> > answer was "no problem"
> >
> > I also know from long lab rat experience that it is not a problem with
> OSPF.
> >
> > I have not tried with either IS-IS or Ripv2, but again, why not?
> >
> > there may be issues with older IOS code. Some vendor older models may
not
> > support it. But I have no reason based on my experience, to believe that
> it
> > is an issue with current IOS code.
> >
> > Chuck
> >
> >
> >
> > ""Pierre-Alex Guanel"" wrote in message
> > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED].;
> > > The statement that provoked my question is from RFC 1721. They say
> > >
> > > "Subnet masks are also necessary for implementation of "classless"
> > > addressing, as the CIDR work proposes"
> > >
> > > thus the question "if a routing protocol supports subnet mask does
that
> > > automatically mean that it can do CIDR?
> > >
> > > ( I think the answer is no because CIDR means that you could have
masks
> > > stilling bits from the newtork ID and the router may not like this
....
> I
> > > also think that historically subnetting and Variable Length subnet
> masking
> > > came before CIDR. But those are just speculations. I don't have
examples
> /
> > > references to support my arguments and I would like to know if I am
> > correct.)
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Pierre-Alex
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=37043&t=37031
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
