First off you can't order an MSFC without the PFC. The PFC is your MultiLayerSwitching card basically. The MSFC2 can do about 600Kpps, but the 6500 can do 30Mpps with the PFC2. The NFFC has the same attributes as the PFC. The RSFC fits on the Supervisor IIG and Supervisor IIIG, like the MSFC fits on the Supervisor within the 6500. Thus saving you a slot over the RSM. In todays world you'd go with the PFC2/MSFC2 for IP Only networks. When we start getting into multiprotocol we need to take a hard look at the traffic requirements and their switching paths.
David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Cisco Nuts > Sent: Tuesday, April 02, 2002 7:55 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RSFC or RSM, MSM or MSFC, PFC or NFFC?? [7:40259] > > > Hello, > When would one implement a RSFC over a RSM or a MSFC over a MSM? Also, do > these cards go along with a NFFC II (for the RSM or RSFC) and a > PFC (for the > MSM or the MSFC)? > What would be the disadvantage if any of not using a NFFC II with > a RSFC or > the PFC with the MSFC? > Thank you. > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > Join the worlds largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail. > http://www.hotmail.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40281&t=40259 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
