The 2900XL does not support PAgP negotiation, so you have to configure the channel as on.
http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/473/44.html David C Prall [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://dcp.dcptech.com > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, April 03, 2002 10:43 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Fast EtherChannel [7:40430] > > > Heres the senerio: > When configuring fast etherchannel between a Cat. 4000 and a Cat. > 2900 using > 2 links, we first plugged the links in and saw that STP disabled one of > them, then on the 4000 we set the two links as fast etherchannel with the > set port channel commands. From the 4000 we varified that the links were > indeed bundled and working as they should, we could even see the > 2900 listed > as the other end. The question(s) is do you have to configure fast > etherchannel at both ends? or is there some sort of negotiation > process, as > with trunking. Secondly from the 2900 we could not view any info or > statistics that would tell us that we were using fast etherchannel or that > any ports were working as such, only when consoled into the 4000 could we > tell. Is this normal behavior? maybe sence we didnt do any configuring on > the 2900 side. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=40435&t=40430 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
