Matt- Why don't you use the config example from this:
Configuring a Cisco 1700/2600/3600 ADSL WIC With IRB and
NAT Using RFC1483 Bridging
 http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/794/wicadsl_rfc_irb_nat_1.html

This is what I just used to set up an ADSL WIC on a 1720, and it pretty much
took right off.

bridge irb
!
!
interface ATM0
 no ip address
 atm ilmi-keepalive
 pvc 0/16 ilmi
 !
 pvc 0/35
  encapsulation aal5snap
 !
 dsl operating-mode auto
 no fair-queue
 bridge-group 1
 hold-queue 224 in
!
interface FastEthernet0
 description connected to Private LAN Block
 ip address 192.168.10.1 255.255.255.0
 ip directed-broadcast
 ip nat inside
 no ip mroute-cache
 no keepalive
 speed auto
 full-duplex
!
interface BVI1
 ip address x.x.x.x 255.255.255.248
 ip nat outside
!
ip nat inside source list 122 interface BVI1 overload

ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 bvi1


.... and the best part is, you can use that second ethernet interface as a
DMZ!

Just my .00000010 though.

-Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
ipguru1
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 10:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: WIC-1ADSL, Qwest DSL [7:41713]


I know this doesn't help, but I have covad dsl and have been trying to use a
1750 on the
other end of my speedstream to do ios firewall... I can't get that to work
either.  When
I do a debug all,... and after I dig through all the other crap... I keep
getting an
encapsulation mismatch and a no keepalive warning.

Sure it doens't help, but doesnt it make you feel better you aren't alone?

bk

Matt Fisher wrote:

> Anybody out there setup a WIC-1ADSL with Qwest DSL in Bridging mode.
>
> I've got a Cisco 2621 and want to bridge the ADSL connection with fa0/0
(and
> NAT fa0/1).  I'm able to get the ATM session up, but can't get IP traffic
to
> flow.
>
> Of the configs at:
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/794/
> the one at:
> http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/794/wicadsl_rfc_6400irb.html
> looks like it is close to what I want, but the config as listed doesn't
> work.  (Can't put the same IP address on two different interfaces.)
>
> Any thoughts...
>
> Matt




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=41784&t=41713
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to