RFC 2547 would be nice but not necessary. What I''d like is practice with the paths, basic things like that. Regarding the use of CEF, is that required? I was hoping for low-budget MPLS labs, maybe even down into the 1600 or 1700 Series. If one were willing to give up the efficiency of the CEF switching path, using only process switching, would MPLS still work? If not, I think most of us can get our hands on 2600's.
-- TT "Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote: > >Howard and scenario builders, > > > >Do you have any MPLS labs that don't use ATM? Maybe combining low-end > >(read "affordable") cisco routers and James Leu's "MPLS for LInux" > >project? > > > >-- TT > > > > Good idea. I haven't written any yet for our labs, but we > specifically upgraded equipment to do so. The "gotcha" is the router > has to be able to support CEF and some related features, which would > up excluding the 2500 series. We had to change to 2600 and 3600 > series to be able to do it. > > I've got a QoS tutorial due out in May, which will be part of a > series. Probably the first two will be QoS without MPLS and the last > one with MPLS. Not sure yet if I want to do BGP/MPLS/RFC2547 before > MPLS QoS. > > -- > "What Problem are you trying to solve?" > ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not > directly to me*** > ******************************************************************************** > Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications http://www.gettlabs.com > Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com > "retired" Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42221&t=42214 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
