>according to Cisco's Software Advisor: ( requires CCO login ) >http://www.cisco.com/kobayashi/support/tac/t_index.shtml#S >scroll down to the software advisor link > >CEF/dCEF is supported on any number of IOS images for the 2500 ( except for >the image I have in my own pod, of course :- wrote in message >[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Again, I didn't do this personally. We upgraded our 2500s to 2600s when we couldn't get MPLS working on them. Maybe it's something other than CEF. Thanks for checking. I can say MPLS works on 2600s and 3600s. > > >Howard and scenario builders, >> > >> >Do you have any MPLS labs that don't use ATM? Maybe combining low-end >> >(read "affordable") cisco routers and James Leu's "MPLS for LInux" >> >project? >> > >> >-- TT >> > >> >> Good idea. I haven't written any yet for our labs, but we >> specifically upgraded equipment to do so. The "gotcha" is the router >> has to be able to support CEF and some related features, which would >> up excluding the 2500 series. We had to change to 2600 and 3600 >> series to be able to do it. >> >> I've got a QoS tutorial due out in May, which will be part of a >> series. Probably the first two will be QoS without MPLS and the last >> one with MPLS. Not sure yet if I want to do BGP/MPLS/RFC2547 before >> MPLS QoS. >> >> -- >> "What Problem are you trying to solve?" >> ***send Cisco questions to the list, so all can benefit -- not >> directly to me*** >> >**************************************************************************** >**** >> Howard C. Berkowitz [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Chief Technology Officer, GettLab/Gett Communications >http://www.gettlabs.com >> Technical Director, CertificationZone.com http://www.certificationzone.com >> "retired" Certified Cisco Systems Instructor (CID) #93005 Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42229&t=42214 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
