Hi Tom, Which URL are you looking for?
At 07:15 PM 4/22/2002 -0400, Tom Scott wrote: >Music to my ears. > >If anyone has a list of exercises for would-be MPLS addicts, please post the >URL. > >-- TT > >"Howard C. Berkowitz" wrote: > > > >Is there some reason that ATM is necessary for MPLS implementations in low > > >end Cisco products? It's been my understanding that VPI/VCI field usage > > >for labels in any implementation is generally not used. Every mpls >network > > >I've worked on used shim headers which makes MPLS l2 agnostic. > > > > Not as far as I know. Should work even with an extra piece of tape on > > an RFC1149 transport. > > > > > > > > > > >At 05:24 AM 4/22/2002 -0400, Tom Scott wrote: > > >>Howard and scenario builders, > > >> > > >>Do you have any MPLS labs that don't use ATM? Maybe combining low-end > > >>(read "affordable") cisco routers and James Leu's "MPLS for LInux" > > >>project? > > >> > > > >-- TT Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42283&t=42214 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
