If one wishes for routing updates to bring up the link, can one not just use the "passive-interface" command on the ISDN interface?
If it is a backup link, passive interface will keep routing updates will keep the link from coming up for updates. Then a couple of floating static routes on either end should bring it up if the primary (dynamic)link goes down as long as the administrative distance for the floaters are greater then that of OSPF. --Tim Ruihai An wrote: > > Hi, Group, > > On an ISDN circuit running ospf , if I want to use "ip ospf > demand-circuit" > to keep it from being brought up by ospf update, do I need to > define > 224.0.0.5 as non-interesting traffic in dialer-list? > > I have configured "ip ospf demand-circuit" on one side of the > ISDN, but > routing update to 224.0.0.5 keeps activating the circuit? What > is the > problem? > > Thanks > > Ruihai > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42431&t=42348 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
