""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > 2950 XL replaced 2900 and 3550 XL replaced 3500. The 2900 and 3500's got > EOL'd .
There is no such thing as a 2950XL or a 3550XL. The 'XL' designation only exists for the 2900 and the 3500. > > -- > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > Get in my head: > http://sar.dynu.com > > > ""Mayo, Simer"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > Has Cisco discontinued the 2900 XL series switches? If so, what are other > > good alternatives for the 2900XL series? > > > > I have a client with a small network about 100 users. At present the > > internal network is @ 10MB/s and will be upgrading to 100MB/s. There are 2 > > file servers, 2 app servers and users do big CAD file transfers. The > budget > > for switches is around $4K. > > The plan is to move the users in 2 differ VLANs depending upong their > > departments and have a 80/20 rule for the traffic. > > > > Thanks > > > > Simer Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=42705&t=42687 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
