well, that's a bit twisted. :-) I guess those 200 other IP access lists were not enough? I fear the router which can use them all and still somehow forward packets.
I'm curious to find if I was correct on the other bit, though... The access list should only apply to the Management functions on the switch, right? Just because it's an IOS switch doesn't mean it has routing functions. Switched traffic would not be effected by an access list applied to the switch. It would only limit traffic from the specified host from, say, telnetting into the sc0 (or keep pings from returning). The rest of the time, the switch will keep on passing traffic based on Layer 2 information, and never pay attention to Layer 3. --Tim, I so much want to be right on this... :-) Marko Milivojevic wrote: > > > Also, What's up with the "2000" access list? Would not an > > extended IP list > > be 100-199? > > 2000-2699 are also extended IP lists. Cisco calls them > "expanded > range" :-). Sort of reminds me of expanded and extended memory > in DOS days > ;-) > > > Marko. > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43137&t=43021 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
