I have a pair of CS11152 in HA mode and we use HTTP for load balancing. In
my opinion if your are using ping to load balance it is a waste. The CSS's
are very capable and load balance HTTP very well. As far as load balancing
methods the engineer at TAC said to use round robin which is the deafult
scheme. I was using ACA, but the engineer said that should be only used for
the heaviest fo traffic sites so i recommend using round robin as well,
it'lll work better.
Here is a sample config:
service svc-w1.web
ip address 172.16.10.100
port 80
keepalive type http
keepalive method get
keepalive uri "/http-ping.html"
active
service svc-w2.web
ip address 172.16.10.101
port 80
keepalive type http
keepalive method get
keepalive uri "/http-ping.html"
active
content cnt-www.cobrand
protocol tcp
port 80
balance roundrobin ##you really don;t need this line becuase
roundrobin is defaut.
url "/*"
add service svc-w1.web
add service svc-w2.web
vip address 192.168.133.100
active
hope this helps
""Patrick Donlon"" wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hi All
>
> I have two web servers which are being load balanced behind a CSS, this
> is working fine. Currently we're using the default ICMP keepalive, this
> is OK if the failure is at this level but when the web services process
> is stopped by the DBA the CSS thinks it's up and running. I've seen the
> different options, tcp, http gets, etc, and would like to know anyone
> else's experience in what is the best balance over performance and
> detecting the lost of service
>
> Cheers
>
> Pat
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43149&t=43141
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
