I second that.
Theo
"Sean Knox"
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/04/2002 09:52 AM
Please respond to "Sean Knox"
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc:
Subject: RE: VLAN Load balancing [7:43265]
Correct me if I'm wrong, but VLAN priorization isn't really load
balancing-
you are just forcing VLANS over a preselected path. It does not take into
consideration that one VLAN may utilize more bandwidth than another.
Sean
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> MADMAN
> Sent: Friday, May 03, 2002 3:05 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: VLAN Load balancing [7:43265]
>
>
> Yes. An example would be two core 6500 trunked together. You have
> switches in the closets, one uplink to 6500A the other to 6500B. Set
> priority on even VLAN/s to A odd to B.
>
> Dave
>
> "Steven A. Ridder" wrote:
> >
> > Does anyone do any VLAN load balancing via STP in the real
> world? I've
> > never seen it yet, and am just curious if it's ever done.
> >
> > --
> >
> > RFC 1149 Compliant.
> > Get in my head:
> > http://sar.dynu.com
> --
> David Madland
> Sr. Network Engineer
> CCIE# 2016
> Qwest Communications Int. Inc.
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 612-664-3367
>
> "Emotion should reflect reason not guide it"
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=43454&t=43265
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
