Try this (not I used standard access list that not only did subnet, but also port.
rate-limit output access-group 101 8000 2000 2000 conform-action transmit excee d-action drop ! acces-list 101 permit tcp 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 any eq 80 -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""Chuck"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I got to thinking about this after posting a question to a company internal > mailing list. Based on some of the responses I received from other > engineers, I wondered at what point one has enough information to answer a > question. At what point asking for further clarification is essentially a > sign that you don't know the answer and you are just stalling. > > Please be assured, I am not looking for "the answer". I have what I need, > including some working configs, which I will post to the list if there is > enough interest. > > I am more interested in the opinions of any number of you folks whose > insight I appreciate. > > So...... here is the e-mail I sent internally. My question is - given what > you see, do you have enough information to provide an answer? If not, why > not? > > > Start question: > --------------------- > > > have a complex QoS traffic shaping rate limiting question. > > internet--->source_router--->gigE_port--->LX_fiber_connection--->gigE > _port---->destination_router--->multiple subnets > > the customer wants to rate limit traffic across the fiber link based on > destination ip subnet. I'm racking my brain trying to figure out how to do > this on something other than a frame or an ATM link. Can't seem to find > the appropriate examples on CCO. > > Question - can one configure different QoS rate limits for different > destination subnets over the same physical interface? All the example I > find are for technologies that use PVC's. I had thought policy routing, > using the route-maps to change TOS bits, and using map classes (?) to > differentiate, but that severely limits the number of subnets I can > manage. > > I have found some docs on CCO, but the examples center around MAC and IP > precedence, not subnet. > > If you have reasonable expertise in QoS rate limiting, can you give me a > call regarding the options I have? > > --------------------- > end of question > > > remember - I have what I need. I am just curious about the nature of > questions and answers, and the clarification process required to provide > answers. Call this a seminar in the design process, maybe? > > I look forward to your sage replies. > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44954&t=44952 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
