Maybe I shot off the answer too soon. If you are just looking for what questions to ask, then here's what I'd ask:
1. What equipment, IOS/CatOS rev? 2. What speeds are the links? (You already have this) 3. What is the purpose of this (get the big picture) 4. Who are you limiting? What speeds to they get? What types of traffic is getting limited? Is it a strict limit or is there some leeway in passing the traffic as long as there's room on the links? -- RFC 1149 Compliant. ""Steven A. Ridder"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > Try this (not I used standard access list that not only did subnet, but also > port. > > rate-limit output access-group 101 8000 2000 2000 conform-action transmit > excee > d-action drop > ! > acces-list 101 permit tcp 10.10.10.0 0.0.0.255 any eq 80 > > -- > > RFC 1149 Compliant. > > > > ""Chuck"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > I got to thinking about this after posting a question to a company > internal > > mailing list. Based on some of the responses I received from other > > engineers, I wondered at what point one has enough information to answer a > > question. At what point asking for further clarification is essentially a > > sign that you don't know the answer and you are just stalling. > > > > Please be assured, I am not looking for "the answer". I have what I need, > > including some working configs, which I will post to the list if there is > > enough interest. > > > > I am more interested in the opinions of any number of you folks whose > > insight I appreciate. > > > > So...... here is the e-mail I sent internally. My question is - given what > > you see, do you have enough information to provide an answer? If not, why > > not? > > > > > > Start question: > > --------------------- > > > > > > have a complex QoS traffic shaping rate limiting question. > > > > internet--->source_router--->gigE_port--->LX_fiber_connection--->gigE > > _port---->destination_router--->multiple subnets > > > > the customer wants to rate limit traffic across the fiber link based on > > destination ip subnet. I'm racking my brain trying to figure out how to > do > > this on something other than a frame or an ATM link. Can't seem to find > > the appropriate examples on CCO. > > > > Question - can one configure different QoS rate limits for different > > destination subnets over the same physical interface? All the example I > > find are for technologies that use PVC's. I had thought policy routing, > > using the route-maps to change TOS bits, and using map classes (?) to > > differentiate, but that severely limits the number of subnets I can > > manage. > > > > I have found some docs on CCO, but the examples center around MAC and IP > > precedence, not subnet. > > > > If you have reasonable expertise in QoS rate limiting, can you give me a > > call regarding the options I have? > > > > --------------------- > > end of question > > > > > > remember - I have what I need. I am just curious about the nature of > > questions and answers, and the clarification process required to provide > > answers. Call this a seminar in the design process, maybe? > > > > I look forward to your sage replies. > > > > Chuck Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=44958&t=44952 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
