Nothing odd here at all Chuck, it would work as you suspect. Dave
Chuck wrote: > got to thinking about this for one reason or another. > > fundamentally, we look at HSRP as a means of providing failover from LAN > stations to redundant WAN links, as illustrated: > > wan_link_1 wan_link_2 > | | > router_1 (HSRP MAC/IP) router_2 > |--------------------------------------| > workstations > > suppose, however, I have a topology wherein I want downstream routers to > have HSRP protection: > > wan_link_1 wan_link_2 > | | > router_1 (HSRP MAC/IP) router_2 > |--------------------------------------| > | workstations | > | | > router_3 router_4 > | | > downstream_group_1 downstream_group_2 > > If I were to set the quad zero route to the HSRP address configured for > routers 1 and 2, think this would work? > > I'm wondering what the implications might be. any thoughts? > > Chuck -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications Inc. 612-664-3367 [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45324&t=45302 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
