Sorry for being so vague, I'm just going off a short conversation and a
design drawn on a beer-stained napkin...

The core PIX is shown as a 515E + VAC with 506s at remote sites.

Jeffrey Reed
Classic Networking, Inc.

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, May 28, 2002 10:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: PIX + VPN Router or Just VPN Router? [7:45315]

I agree.  I am confused.

When you say the core pix, is that another 506?

Sorry but like I am confused.






"Henry D."
Sent by: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
05/29/2002 11:00 AM
Please respond to "Henry D."


        To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        cc:
        Subject:        Re: PIX + VPN Router or Just VPN Router? [7:45315]


What you are describing doesn't really make sense. You say
you have connections back to the core site from all remotes.
If that was the case there would be no reason for the pix at remote
sites or an obvious reason for vpn tunnels between remotes and the core
site.
In that case, you could just put the core pix in front of the core site
and
the remotes,
terminate the remotes before the core pix, and no need for all the other
mess.

But I have a feeling there is more involved than we know at the
moment.....:(


""Jeffrey Reed""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> I am curious about recommendations on remote office connections when
VPNs
> are involved. Today, in two separate occasions I ran into designs that
> showed remote sites with a small 1720 router and a PIX 506. The 506
> terminated one end of a tunnel back to the core PIX and the 1720
facilitated
> the frame connection. All traffic will be going back to the core, then
if
> needed, to the Internet through the central sites main connection.
>
> Why cant you just use the 1720s ability to terminate a tunnel and drop
all
> non-encrypted traffic and eliminate the need for the PIX? This would
reduce
> the costs of both the initial purchase as well as ongoing support. What
are
> the downsides to a design without a PIX at the remote site?
>
> Thanks!!
>
> Jeff




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=45327&t=45315
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to