on a completely different topic, are the GBIC-SX and the WS-X5484 different
names for the same identical piece of equipment?
If so, where on CCO does it say so? If not, then why not use a single part
number?

I ask because there seems to be a difference of opinion, with some folks at
Cisco saying absolutely they are different and not interchangeable, and some
folks not at Cisco, but with beau coup field experience saying there is no
difference whatsoever and the parts are exchangeable problem free.

just wondering where a guy goes to get The Truth ;->




""Larry Letterman""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> you apparently dont need the token or cat switch
> anymore if you are taking the lab after october...
>
>
> Larry Letterman
> Cisco Systems
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> Hunt Lee
> Sent: Wednesday, June 12, 2002 7:02 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: CCIE home lab [7:46395]
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I know that this may have come up many times.  But since I'm about to
start
> preparing for the CCIE lab, it would be great if anyone could give me some
> suggestions on this. I'm planning to continue to build up my lab.
>
> Currently, I have the following:
>
> 2 x 1603R
>
> 3 x 2501
>
> 2 x 2503
>
> 2 x 2511
>
> 1 x Cat 5000
>
> I'm thinking whether I should get the below:-
>
> 2 x Token routers - maybe 2 x 2502?? MAU?? What else do I need for Token??
I
> really don't know what else I need...
>
> 1 x Frame switch - ????
>
> 1 x ISDN Simulator (do u know which one is good?)
>
> And I probably need to upgrade RAM / Flash on my routers... since most of
> them only had 4MB Flash on the moment...
>
> Any ideas would be greatly appreciated.
>
> Thanks
>
> --
>
> Hunt Lee
>
> WebCentral




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46420&t=46395
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to