One thing the Cisco IDS has, and why we went with it is because of the host sensors, and the ability to cooralate all the hosts data with the network data. Although we haven't purchased the hosts as of yet, we know it's viable.
-TV ""Brian Zeitz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I read that the 2600 router (or definitely higher model routers) have > IDS built in, but if you bought any Pix Firewall it wouldn't have IDS. > Am I mistaken on this? So the most people who want IDS who cannot afford > / justify (just yet) and IDS box are using Snort? I have a pix 515UR, > and if I read correctly, it has the capabilities to interface to an IDS > box, but it is not an IDS box itself. Also, if I use Snort as an IDS, > will the pix be able to recognize it? Maybe Microsoft will come out with > a tool of this nature, which is free (not really free, but included with > OS) like some of the built in components in 2000. > > > > If I have some misinformation here, I have not read my 1000 page IDS > book as of yet, but I am working on MCNS. > > > > I found a document that will allow me to install Snort on Windows 2000, > that is my current plan for implementing IDS. Can anyone give me the > pros and cons of Snort Vs. Cisco IDS system? What other alternatives > should I be looking at. My company does not really need an IDS as of > yet, but I am doing this just for fun and for learning about > security/IDS. > > > > Hope my pro-Microsoft attitude is OK in the group. I like working on > routers and security, and don't spend a lot of time tweeking around with > Operating Systems. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=46693&t=46639 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
