Hi Paul, The 3524-XL is not a set based switch. It is an IOS based switch. The commands would be different. Don't have access to internet / documentation right now but it would be done under each 'interface' ie. Fastethernet 0/2 etc
Thanks Manish -----Original Message----- From: Paul [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 02 July 2002 12:20 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Dual Link redundancy .... [7:47854] Can't I use the port group 1 distribution destination on both switches ??? I tried using set trunk ... but the switch did'nt understand the command ... the switch is running Version 12.0(5.3) and it is a WS-C3524-XL. I tried running the set trunk command from global config and int config mode .... do I assume that this will only run on a router ???? and not a switch ??? and if so .. do I need to use the port group 1 distribution destination on both switches ??? Thankx Paul ... ----- Original Message ----- From: "Chris Harshman" To: Sent: Monday, July 01, 2002 7:58 PM Subject: RE: Dual Link redundancy .... [7:47854] > Configure both links as trunks then form an ether-channel. Both links will > pass traffic but a failure of one will not affect the other. > > Cisco Example: > set trunk 1/1 dot1q on > set trunk 1/2 dot1q on > > set port channel 1/1-2 on Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=47930&t=47854 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
