My guess is that your sniffer sees them as 60 bytes, since most sniffers
leave don;t count the CRC which is 4 bytes. Most of these are ARP packets.

""Alejandro Acosta Alamo""  wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
> Hello again,
>   Priscilla, you have said that an ethernet frame must be at least 64
bytes,
> right?. I have just placed an sniffer on my LAN and I found over 3000 out
of
> 15.000 packets. Does this mean that 20% of those packets are illegal?
>
> Thanks
>
> Alejandro Acosta
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Priscilla Oppenheimer"
> To:
> Sent: Monday, July 08, 2002 1:08 PM
> Subject: RE: Cut-through vs Store & Forward [7:48316]
>
>
> > Alejandro Acosta Alamo wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello,
> > >   I understand the differences between Cut-through and Store &
> > > Forward. My
> > > question is: How do you decide with method to use?, in whch
> > > situation have
> > > you change the switching method?.
> > >
> > > Thanks
> > >
> > > Alejandro Acosta
> > >
> > >
> > A lot of switches support only one method, so you don't have a choice.
If
> > you do have a choice, the decision is based on the number of errors on
> your
> > network. Cut-through doesn't do any error checking and in fact forwards
> > frames that have a bad CRC or are too short. Ethernet says that frames
> must
> > be at least 64 bytes. Anything less is considered a fragment and is
> illegal.
> > Cut-through forwards fragments that have an entire destination address
> that
> > can be looked up to get a port number.
> >
> > If your switch connects many shared networks, then CRC errors and
> fragments
> > due to collisions are normal. But why waste bandwidth forwarding these
to
> > other ports on the LAN? In this case, you might want to go with
> > store-and-forward which does not forward errored frames or fragments.
> >
> > If your switch connects single devices all using full-duplex, then it's
> > unlikely that you are experiencing many CRC or fragments. So,
cut-through
> > makes the most sense.
> >
> >
> > Priscilla Oppenheimer
> > http://www.priscilla.com




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48537&t=48316
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to