I interpret the question to inquire if one should take "Lab version 1.0" or wait for "Lab version 1.01". There are bound to be bugs.
>>> "The_Jester" 07/14/02 04:40PM >>> The point I was trying to make is that the subject matter is not so hard that one needs to cheat to pass. ""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > At 7:48 AM +0000 7/14/02, The_Jester wrote: > >Take the exam on the 5th. If you need to rely on others to break the NDA > >before you can pass (as Chuck suggests), then you don't deserve the > >certification anyway. None of this stuff is Rocket Science. > > Years ago, I was teaching a networking seminar at Kennedy Space > Center. On a break, I wandered to the door of one of the other > classrooms and listened in on the course in progress, which dealt > with the Shuttle propulsion system. I'd swear I heard the instructor, > frustrated with his class, say "Hey, this is rocket science, not BGP!" > > In the many mergers that led up to Global Knowledge, PSC was acquired > by MacDonald Detweiler, which, in turn, was acquired by Orbital > Sciences--which does actually do satellites and rockets. At our > first get-together, we inquired if it was now politically incorrect > for us to refer to something as rocket science, and they went into > hysterical giggles. Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48853&t=48731 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
