If there weren't any bugs, it wouldn't be Cisco. ""Ken Diliberto"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I interpret the question to inquire if one should take "Lab version 1.0" > or wait for "Lab version 1.01". There are bound to be bugs. > > >>> "The_Jester" 07/14/02 04:40PM >>> > The point I was trying to make is that the subject matter is not > so hard that one needs to cheat to pass. > > ""Howard C. Berkowitz"" wrote in message > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > At 7:48 AM +0000 7/14/02, The_Jester wrote: > > >Take the exam on the 5th. If you need to rely on others to break the > NDA > > >before you can pass (as Chuck suggests), then you don't deserve the > > >certification anyway. None of this stuff is Rocket Science. > > > > Years ago, I was teaching a networking seminar at Kennedy Space > > Center. On a break, I wandered to the door of one of the other > > classrooms and listened in on the course in progress, which dealt > > with the Shuttle propulsion system. I'd swear I heard the > instructor, > > frustrated with his class, say "Hey, this is rocket science, not > BGP!" > > > > In the many mergers that led up to Global Knowledge, PSC was > acquired > > by MacDonald Detweiler, which, in turn, was acquired by Orbital > > Sciences--which does actually do satellites and rockets. At our > > first get-together, we inquired if it was now politically incorrect > > for us to refer to something as rocket science, and they went into > > hysterical giggles.
Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=48997&t=48731 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
