Is this what is happening? Would it not be looking at it's routing table, seeing that another host on the same subnet is the next hop, and then sending an ICMP re-direct message to the originating host, telling it to go directly to the 192.168.0.100 host?
Symon -----Original Message----- From: sam sneed [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 24 July 2002 22:54 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: Proper network design? [7:49536] This is not the classcial router on a stick model. That model is for routing between VLANs on a router with 1 interface using trunking. All this router is doing is taking packets from its eth1 interface, comparing them to its routing table and forwarding out the same eth1 interface for the gateway which is designated for the 192.168.2.0 network. This is totally legitmate and no secondary or subinterfaces are needed. ""Frank H"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > The "router on a stick" effect comes from this: > > ip route 192.168.2.0 255.255.255.0 192.168.0.100 > > All traffic destined to any network not on 192.168.0.0 goes to the > gateway > (192.168.0.1) on interface ethernet 1. The router then re-routes 192.168.2.0 > traffic back on the 192.168.0.0 network to 192.168.0.100 (the "router > on a stick" effect). Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=49642&t=49536 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
