The signalling protocol used to set-up/tear-down a converstation wouldn't affect the quality of the voice. Maybe the equipment you used was superior, or was on a low latency network.
""Gunjan Mathur"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I tested one SIP equipement of vonage, and that was > far far better then any device using H323...that's the > reason I want to know the diff in between these two. > What I understand is SIP model works on www/internet > and h323 model is telephony, I believe this is the > main reason for the quality difference. > > What you suggest... > TIA > > --- "Steven A. Ridder" wrote: > > I agree that SIP is the future, it just isn't there > > yet. There is some SIP > > being built into Unity and CM, but until everything > > is SIP (as opposed to > > MGCP/H.323 and Skinny), it just isn't useful yet. > > > > I know that SIP is being deployed in SP networks, > > and I have implemented it > > in a Telco, but for enterprise, it's useless. I > > can't wait til it is > > developed and more mature. > > > > > > ""Jason Weden"" wrote in message > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > > > Ok, so SIP is nowhere near useless. It is being > > used all over the place > > and > > > will eventually replace H.323. Telcos like Vonage > > (which uses Cisco SIP > > > equipment), deltathree, and Denwa are using it for > > last mile telephony > > > connectivity for residences and enterprises, and > > WorldCom, after surfacing > > > from its financial issues, will be using it on its > > global network as well. > > > Microsoft has built a SIP client into Windows XP > > (Microsoft Messenger) and > > > SIP is very flexible and extensible and the best > > place to start is > > > http://www.sipcenter.com. PBX manufacturers like > > Mitel and Siemens have > > > developed their PBX completely around SIP. > > > > > > To get back to Cisco (as this is a Cisco > > newsgroup), Cisco has taken the > > > time and $$ to start to develop SIP functionality > > in its products despite > > > the fact that it isn't need for AVVID at all. > > Though their initial SIP > > > focus is on carrier-class products (since that is > > the logical choice -- > > see > > > my list of companies above), my bet is that SIP > > will surface as a more > > > central part of the AVVID architecture for the > > enterprise. A good Cisco > > > link is here: > > > > > > http://www.cisco.com/warp/public/cc/techno/tyvdve/sip/prodlit/index.shtml > > > > > > or here (which displays more enterprise > > scenarios): > > > > > > > > > http://cisco.com/univercd/cc/td/doc/product/voice/sipsols/biggulp/index.htm > > > Regards, > > > > > > Jason > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > __________________________________________________ > Do you Yahoo!? > New DSL Internet Access from SBC & Yahoo! > http://sbc.yahoo.com Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=53915&t=53852 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
