Harold,

>From my quick look at this product, it seems to use DNS changes for failover
onto another ISP and keeping connectivity. It works different than how BGP
would for redundancy, with some limitations.

BTW. How much does this product cost?

Regards,

Albert

-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:nobody@;groupstudy.com]On Behalf Of
Harold Monroe
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: BGP4 and Multiple Providers [7:55918]


You might want to check out this company www.fatpipeinc.com

We have two T1's load balanced (with two different providers - XO &
WorldCom) using their hardware/software device and no BGP needed!


                -----Original Message-----
                From:   Brian (273954) [mailto:brian@;nextmill.net]
                Sent:   Friday, October 18, 2002 5:24 PM
                To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                Subject:        BGP4 and Multiple Providers [7:55918]

                We are bringing in a second DS3 line into our Cisco 7206 v12
router and was
                hoping for some general advise.
                Our current provider is a 9mbps DS3 from Genuity.  We are
bringing in a
                seconds DS3 from PAJO at 6mbps for redundancy and to bring
the usage down on
                the Genuity line.

                My question is what commands do I need to look into when I
have the BGP4
                setup on the router in order to handle the flow of traffic
properly?

                90% of our traffic is OUTBOUND (up to the internet) and we
need to balance
                this traffic between the 9mbps and 6mbps connections.  From
what I am told
                this won't be an automatic process but something I will have
to tweak on
                occation depending on if traffic demands change between the
connections.

                How am I best going to control this outbound flow of
traffic?  My idea was
                that when one connection is using a high % I can manually
modify a metric of
                some sort to make the router believe that that connection is
not as
                preferred as it once was and start sending a little of the
traffic over the
                other connection instead.  Am I being realistic here?
[EMAIL PROTECTED]




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=56117&t=55918
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to