The issue here is beyond just the NDA, but also getting the right info from Cisco as what is the current setup.
If you guys are curious check this link. It discusses what was at the labs in the spring of this year. http://www.groupstudy.com/archives/ccielab/200207/msg02557.html Kaminski, Shawn G wrote: > > While I agree that it's probably the safest way to go about it, > we're > talking about a terminal emulator here, not the actual content > of the lab. I > guess there's a fine line between the NDA and paranoia! :-) > I'll write Cisco > and get an answer. > > Shawn K. > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Thomas Larus [SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Thursday, October 17, 2002 4:20 PM > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Subject: Re: Would this break the NDA [7:55799] > > > > Your policy is definitely the safest. The stakes are pretty > high, and if > > you ask, and Cisco refuses to answer, then you will know that > it is not > > something to discuss on this list. Some may disagree with > the policy, but > > Cisco is in the driver's seat on its NDA policy, and it is > not worth > > risking losing so much just to tilt at windmills. > > > > > > Tom Larus, CCIE #10,014 > > > > ""Paul Jin"" wrote in message > > news:200210171808.SAA07127@;groupstudy.com... > > > If you guys have any specific questions, you can write the > CCIE team > > > at Cisco and they will provide you the answers. This way, > you know for > > sure > > > it is not breaking the NDA. > > > > > > - Paul > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=55842&t=55799 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
