Unless you're doing some kind of bridging or IRB, this won't be a problem. Even then, I'm not sure it would necessarily be a problem. In a "normal" topology, VLANs are locally significant.
Thomas N. wrote: > > Hi All, > > I am wondering if the VLAN number is valid locally on a LAN > only or it goes > across the WAN link? In my scenario, I have two LANs separated > with 2 WAN > routers. On the LAN # 1, I assign a VLAN 100 with IP address > (gateway) of > 10.100.1.1. On LAN # 2, I assign another VLAN 100 but with an > IP address of > 10.200.1.1. The WAN link is using a 172.16.10.0 subnet, and > does routing > between 10.0.0.0 and 172.16.10.0 networks. > > My question is that will VLAN 100 on LAN # 1 distinguishes from > VLAN 100 on > the LAN # 2? Can I have 2 different subnets with the same VLAN > ID number > but sitting on 2 separate LANs? Hosts in the first VLAN 100 > should not talk > to others in the second VLAN 100 without using the routers? > Thanks All! > > Thomas > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58563&t=58559 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
