Hi Larry, I am using trunking on the LAN side of the routers to route between VLANs. However, WAN interfaces of these routers are not configured as trunk. The WAN link is just connected using a different subnet. And no, I don't use bridging. So if VLAN is just local significant, should it not be a problem? Thanks!
Thomas ""Larry Letterman"" wrote in message [EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]... > I would think that you can bridge them with IRB/CRB but the vlan id > would not be > an issue since the connections are not using isl/dot1q trunking. You > would basically > be making a flat network across the wan links. The vlan information > will only propagate > across trunk links that pass the vlan id in the layer 2 frame. > > -Larry > > s vermill wrote: > > >Larry Letterman wrote: > > > >>Not unless the routers were using trunking and it does not > >>sound like > >>they are... > >>The L3 links to each lan switch dont know anything about the > >>vlan . > >> > >>Larry > >> > > > >Larry, > > > >Just curious... Can VLANs be bridged over a bridge group that includes > >serial WAN connectivity or is a FE or GE trunk the only possibility? > > > >Scott Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=58634&t=58559 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
