At 11:36 PM +0000 1/12/03, Emilia Lambros wrote:
>Basically any changes to the sticky/persistent part are not options :( the
>hardware that's in and performing the load balancing won't be changed
>because it works - the NAT portion just needs some ... horrible kludges? :)

But isn't NAT itself, independent of vendor and implementation, a 
kludge?  Sometimes it's a good kludge, considering the circumstances.

I have long proclaimed that Australians should be the best at 
networking.  Anyone who grows up thinking a platypus, that ultimate 
biological kludge of multispecies spare parts moving in close 
coordination, shouldn't be fazed by any of this. :-)




Message Posted at:
http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=60928&t=60663
--------------------------------------------------
FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html
Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to