Heck, we have one that's over 120 lines long! :-) It's a tad complex. John
>>> "MADMAN" 1/28/03 2:25:20 PM >>> If this is the same thread I thought Mike wrote back to me that is was something like 64 lines, that's nothing. If you open a case with Cisco they will probably tell you to upgrade. I'll save you the trouble, try upgrading, 12.2.13T is available :) Dave Howard C. Berkowitz wrote: > At 4:57 PM +0000 1/28/03, John Neiberger wrote: > >>Hmm.... you must have some freakin' long ACLs! :-) Still, that's >>pretty strange behavior. I don't know if the feature is available on >>that platform but you might try using "access-list compiled" to allow >>the router to process them more efficiently. I doubt that would even >>help this problem, though. >> >>If you're truly running out of config space try using "service >>compress-config" to free up some room. >> >>It sounds like you may be running into a 'feature' that TAC might be >>able to help with. >> >>John > > > > There is a problem that affects some large ISPs with extremely long > access lists. I've seen Tier 1 routers with large warnings on the > console, "DO NOT SAVE RUNNING-CONFIG STARTING-CONFIG". > > Their lists are too long to have the config fit into NVRAM, but their > workaround is always to load configs from TFTP. Do check that you > aren't short on NVRAM. > > This doesn't sound quite the same as your problem, though. > > >>>>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >>>> >>1/28/03 9:37:22 AM >>> >>The router is a 3640. >> >>I'm using the following image: c3640-ik9o3s-mz.122-11T >> >>-----Original Message----- >>From: John Neiberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] >>Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 10:27 AM >>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>Subject: Re: ACL memory space [7:62028] >> >> >>What router and image is this happening on? >> >>John >> >> >>>>> "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" >>>> >>1/28/03 8:47:57 AM >>> >>Is there a way to devote separate memory space for ACLs? >> >>I just opened a TAC case; but I'm still having problems with my lists >>getting dropped, I've even went so far as to delete all the entries >>and >>reenter only a couple. >> >>Scenario: I shell into the router, add one additional host to >>access-list >>1. As soon as I hit enter, all the acls from list one dissappear. >>It's >>gotten to the point where the ACL allowing access to the router >>dissappeared. This is driving me crazy.... I'm thinking it's a bad >>image.?.?.? -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62062&t=62028 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
