Glad you got it figured out and I hope you learned some reason(s) not to do unnumbered. I can't think of and good reasons for it and if you running out of addresses I have an RFC full of them for you;)
Dave Deepak N wrote: > Hi Vermill > Now I got the point. So when i am using the numbered interface, the router > tries to reach the next hop via the next hop ip address, in my case it is > behind the directly connected interface.But it has no way of finding the > next hop ip address behind the unnumbered interface. So it was not able to > reach the other end. While both are unnumbered, the routes were installed > based on the outgoing interface. > > Thank you all for helping me out to find the solution. > > Thanks n regards > Deepak -- David Madland CCIE# 2016 Sr. Network Engineer Qwest Communications 612-664-3367 "You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer." --Winston Churchill Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=62207&t=62134 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
