""Casey, Paul (6822)"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Hello, > > > I have ospf in to rip redistribution on a /24 classfull boundary, I > Summarized/ area range(d) all the networks in ospf domain to /24 to get them > to show up in rip.domain. > > No real problems here, though I haved one network in ospf 200.200.0.0/16 > which is not showing up in rip router. > What can I do to make this /16 route cross the classfull boundary, as its > prefix is shorter that the /24 network it need to cross thus cant be > summarised. > Or should this route be capable of traversing the /24 classful boundary, > automatically,. > Any help greatly appreciated.
depending upon your other restrictions ( is this a practice lab or a production network? ) you can make make the receiveing router a RIPv2. Then the process will accesspt the 200.200.0.0/16 CIDR prefix. In the Cisco world, the RIPv1 routers will accept this prefix, *I think* because Cisco rip1 routers can receive rip2 routes. in a mixed vendor environment, this might not work at all. > > Kind regard. > Paul. > > > **************************************************************************** ************ > > This E-mail is from O2. The E-mail and any files > transmitted with it are confidential and may also be privileged and intended > solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed. > Any unauthorised direct or indirect dissemination, distribution or copying > of this message and any attachments is strictly prohibited. If you have > received the E-mail in error please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED] or > telephone ++ 353 1 6095000. > > **************************************************************************** ************* Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63648&t=63647 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
