""alaerte Vidali"" wrote in message news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > I tried to achieve the result - no success; can you give us a tip? > > What I did was using a /16 mask on the link between the RIP routers. But > when I use ip ad 200.200.1.1 255.255.255.0 RIP do not run on the interface, > although the interface is showed on the result of show ip protocol. > > R1: > > inter serial 0.12 point > ip ad 200.200.1.1 255.255.0.0
you are correct. this won't work. a ways back I did some experimenting, and at the time I found that even if all routers are RIPv2, the process will not accept CIDR prefixes. You had to redistribute CIDR routes into RIPv2 Think another way. Particularly since PC said this was from a practice lab. You have to think crooked. > > > R1#sh ip prot > Routing Protocol is "rip" > Sending updates every 30 seconds, next due in 21 seconds > Invalid after 180 seconds, hold down 180, flushed after 240 > Outgoing update filter list for all interfaces is not set > Incoming update filter list for all interfaces is not set > Redistributing: rip > Default version control: send version 1, receive version 1 > Interface Send Recv Triggered RIP Key-chain > Loopback0 1 1 how exactly did this happen? this is not the Cisco RIP default setting, so something changed. > Automatic network summarization is not in effect > Maximum path: 4 > Routing for Networks: > 1.0.0.0 > 200.201.0.0 > Routing Information Sources: > Gateway Distance Last Update > 192.168.255.6 120 00:03:52 > Distance: (default is 120) Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=63721&t=63647 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
