Scott Roberts wrote: > > good point, I'm new to the forum and wasn't quite sure of what > approaches to > answers people expected. I do like his approach to answering > it, because if > you look at the link, the answer is in there (with the use of > some deductive > logic). > > the only thing that worries me though, is that if people never > get a > straight answer, will they then stop asking questions?
Welcome to Group Study. Nobody ever gets a straight answer here! ;-) And usually they shouldn't. With the exception of the ones and zeros that go across the wire (or air), most other things in this industry are simply not black-and-white. Just wait till the next time someone asks what a L3 switch is or what layer ARP runs at! :-) Priscilla > its nice > to see an > open forum about cisco networking thats actually well > populated, I'd like to > support it as much as I can. > > scott > > ""Priscilla Oppenheimer"" wrote in > message > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Scott Roberts wrote: > > > > > > shoulds like you're trying to answer a trick question on a > > > test? I suppose > > > "The Long and Winding Road" wanted you to work for your > answer, > > > but I'll > > > come out and tell you. > > > > Why did you come out and tell the original poster the answer? > Wouldn't the > > poster learn more from working it out? I liked "The L&W > Road's" answer > much > > better. :-) > > > > Wouldn't the poster be a better representative of the relevant > certification > > having worked it out? For example, if the poster is going for > CCNP and > > manages to pass because people provided answers instead of > methods for > > figuring out the answer, is that a good thing for the rest of > us who wish > > CCNP to be a respected certification? > > > > The poster asked for suggestions, not answers, and that's > what we should > > have provided. > > > > Hopefully the poster will try this in a lab. There is at > least one minor > > gotcha that I can think of. > > > > Hey, you had to expect to get slammed for this! ;-) I'm doing > this with > all > > due respect and a recognition of how fun it is to give an > answer. I think > a > > lot of us participate on the list partly to give answers > because it's fun > > and a nice ego stroke, myself included. But the real goal of > Group Study > is > > to help people learn. > > > > Priscilla > > > > > > > > > > ospf defaults the dead-interval/hold-time as a multiple of > the > > > hello time, > > > so if you change the hello time the dead interval changes > > > automatically > > > also. > > > > > > scott > > > > > > ""nilesh bothra"" wrote in message > > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Q. Change OSPF dead interval to 60 seconds. > > > > You are not allowed to use the command 'ip ospf > > > dead-interval" for > > > > accomplishing this task. > > > > > > > > Suggestions pls???? > > > > > > > > Nilesh > > Message Posted at: http://www.groupstudy.com/form/read.php?f=7&i=64415&t=64311 -------------------------------------------------- FAQ, list archives, and subscription info: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/cisco.html Report misconduct and Nondisclosure violations to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
