Fajar A. Nugraha wrote: > How is that so? > From daily.cvd's COPYING : > > - GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE Version 2 > Isn't LGPL more suitable for libraries?
Why should it be? *IF* the authors chose to license it to you in a way, which *only* allows you to incorporate it into Programs with GPL compatible licenses, it should be respected. > - 1. You may copy and distribute verbatim copies of the Program's > source code as you receive it, in any medium ... > He didn't distribute it. He just use it He uses it in a program. He has to load it somehow. > How is his using clamavdb (but does not distribute it), be different > from hosting appliances (Ensim, CPanel, etc) which uses numerous open > source programs on Linux (apache, mysql, and even clamav) but does not > distribute it? I don't see Ensim released as GPL. He has to link the database *somehow* into his program. Look up what the GPL has to say about that. And: Hey, if you do not like the license of a program - do not use it. It is simple as that. If you want to use it - fulfill the license. Ralph -- Ralph [EMAIL PROTECTED] | .."Text processing has made it possible Bayerischer Rundfunk...HA-Multimedia | ....to right-justify any idea, even one Rundfunkplatz 1........80300 MÃnchen | .which cannot be justified on any other Tl:089.5900.16023..Fx:089.5900.16240 | ..........grounds." -- J. Finnegan, USC
pgpFSx1bVxGDc.pgp
Description: PGP signature
