*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********
On 4/15/2005 at 3:58 PM Nigel Horne wrote: >On Friday 15 Apr 2005 15:56, Carl Thompson wrote: >> >> *********** REPLY SEPARATOR *********** >> >> On 4/14/2005 at 10:24 PM Nigel Horne wrote: >> >> >> Okay this is what i have for clamav-milter on remote server >> > >> >Remote to sendmail? Or remote to clamd? Or both? >> > >> >> CLAMAV_FLAGS="-qlm5 --external --server=xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx >> >> local:/var/run/clamav/clmilter.sock" >> >> >> >> and I have to run clamd on that server so that clamav uses it >> >> externally to scan for virus (if i understand this correctly) >> > >> >I presume by "that server" you mean the server running clamav-milter >> > >> >> >> >> and on my primary server i did the same thing and clamav creates >> >> local socket and scans thru clamd on remote server. >> > >> >I presume by "primary server" you mean the server running clamd, though >> >I don't understand what you mean by you "did the same thing"? Why would >> >you do the same on both machines? Surely one runs clamd and one >> >runs clamav-milter? >> > >> >> however if i use >> >> INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clamav', `S=inet:[EMAIL PROTECTED], F=, >T=S:4m;R:4m')dnl >> >> (machine name chaned to correct machine of course) >> > >> >By "machineb" do you mean the same as "primary server" above? Or the >> >same as "that server"? >> > >> >> I still get socket errors in maillog about attempting to scan and >> >> clamd is on the remote socket not clamav-milter on the remote socket. >> > >> >> I'm sure i'm doing something simple wrong but I sure can't figure it >out. >> > >> >Sorry, but I can't figure out what you're trying to do and what you've >> >tried to set up. >> > >> >The following scenarios are possible: >> >1) sendmail, clamav-milter and clamd all on one machine >> >2) sendmail and clamav-milter on one machine, clamd on another machine >> >3) sendmail on one machine, clamav-milter and clamd on another machine >> >4) sendmail, clamav-milter and clamd all on separate machines >> >5) sendmail and clamav-milter on one machine, clamd running on multiple >> >machines load balanced >> >6) sendmail and clamav-milter on separate machines, clamd running on >> >multiple machines load balanced, which may include the same machines. >> > >> >Please be very specific about what you're trying to achieve. I guess >> >it's either scenario 2 or scenario 3? >> I can get scenario 2 to work without a problem and this is how I did it >for some time before .82 (when clamd scanning was integrated into >clamav-milter and you no longer needed to run clamd just for clamav-milter) >> >> The problem I have is scenario 3. >> >> machine a has sendmail on it >> machine b is a low use box so I would like to run clamav-milter and >clamd (if its necessary now) on it and have machine a connect to >clamav-milter on machine b. however I am unable to get clamav-milter to >listen on a TCP port on machine b > >Machine a configure looks correct: > INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clamav', `S=inet:[EMAIL PROTECTED], F=, > T=S:4m;R:4m')dn > >On machineb try starting clamav-milter thus (based on the options you >gave, and ensure that clamd >is running on machineb first): > CLAMAV_FLAGS="-qlm5 --external inet:3311" > >> Carl > >-Nigel > As a final update to this little endeavor this is what I did on the mail server i used INPUT_MAIL_FILTER(`clamav', `S=inet:[EMAIL PROTECTED], F=, T=S:4m;R:4m')dn on the scanning server i did the following CLAMAV_FLAGS="-qlm5 inet:3311 --server xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx" I tried it with --external and that worked fine if I had clamd running (as it should be) so I figured i would try it internal and that worked fine. I did however have to specify --server because without it it bound to 3311 of 127.0.0.1 Carl _______________________________________________ http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
